Draft initiative bill on control over deepfakes

Initiatiefwetsvoorstel Zeggenschap over deepfakes

rights policy item·draft legislation·closed

A closed public-consultation draft proposed a neighboring right allowing natural persons, artists, and specified successors to authorize or prohibit defined deepfakes of voice or appearance; it was not law at the snapshot date.

Recorded facts

Official sitehttps://www.internetconsultatie.nl/zeggenschapoverdeepfakes/b1
GeographyNetherlands
partiesproposed right holders; deepfake makers and distributors; online intermediaries
item typedraft_legislation
filing date2025-10-30
jurisdictionNetherlands
adoption dateunknown
affected worksvoice; likeness; performances; synthetic audiovisual and audio output
effective dateunknown
affected modelsunknown
canonical titleInitiatiefwetsvoorstel Zeggenschap over deepfakes
enforcement dateunknown
affected datasetsunknown
issuing authorityInitiating member of the House of Representatives; public consultation hosted by the Government of the Netherlands
primary documentshttps://www.internetconsultatie.nl/zeggenschapoverdeepfakes/b1; https://www.internetconsultatie.nl/zeggenschapoverdeepfakes/document/14831; https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/ah-tk-20252026-1351.html
affected entity typesnatural persons; performers; artists; heirs; AI developers; platforms; media producers
affected organizationsunknown
documented interpretationsunknown
affected professional workflowsvoice cloning; deepfake production; platform distribution; artist authorization
current procedural legal statuspublic consultation closed; draft not introduced in Parliament as of the latest official posture source reviewed
amendments appeals superseding itemsunknown
obligations permissions restrictionsThe consultation draft proposed a right to authorize or prohibit making, using, and distributing deepfakes of a person's voice or appearance.; The proposal covered every natural person, with artist-specific provisions and specified post-mortem successor interests.; Exceptions and limitations were proposed; the exact balance would depend on legislative text and any amendments.; The proposal has no binding effect unless introduced and enacted.

History

evaluates (by)Dutch Copyright Committee advice on the draft deepfake bill 2026-02-04nowUnverifiedSource 1 VERIFIED high confidence

Sources & changes

Checked 10d ago · highhow verification works
VERIFIEDshort descriptioncited source
VERIFIEDprimary geographycited source
VERIFIEDissuing authoritycited source
VERIFIEDaffected entity typescited source
VERIFIEDcurrent procedural legal statuscited source
VERIFIEDobligations permissions restrictionscited source
VERIFIEDprimary documentscited source
VERIFIEDaffected professional workflowscited source
VERIFIEDunresolved legal or factual questionscited source
VERIFIEDobligations permissions restrictionscited source
VERIFIEDcurrent procedural legal statuscited source
  • Status unknown → closed
  • Official URL unknown → www.internetconsultatie.nl/zeggenschapoverdeepfakes/b1
  • Record maintenance · 12 fields updated

Structured information, not legal advice.

Is this yours? Claim this record →·See something wrong? Report a correction →