California AB 2602
rights policy item·state law·active
Makes specified broad digital-replica clauses unenforceable when use is not reasonably specific and the performer lacked counsel or union representation.
Recorded facts
| Official site | https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2602 ↗ |
|---|---|
| Geography | California, United States |
| identifier | Chapter 259, Statutes of 2024 |
| parties | unknown |
| item type | state_law |
| confidence | high |
| identifier | Chapter 259, Statutes of 2024 |
| filing date | unknown |
| jurisdiction | California, United States |
| adoption date | 2024-09-17 |
| affected works | new performances; sound recordings; audiovisual works |
| current status | in_force |
| effective date | 2025-01-01 |
| affected models | unknown |
| canonical title | California AB 2602 |
| confidence basis | Primary document reviewed; status language is conservative. |
| enforcement date | unknown |
| affected datasets | unknown |
| issuing authority | California Legislature |
| primary documents | https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2602 |
| unresolved questions | How courts will measure reasonable specificity and apply the statute to legacy agreements. |
| affected entity types | performers; employers; producers; record labels |
| affected organizations | unknown |
Sources & changes
Checked 11d ago · mediumhow verification works
Field-level evidence
Public change history
- Status unknown → active
- Official URL unknown → leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2602
- Record maintenance · 12 fields updated
Structured information, not legal advice.
Is this yours? Claim this record →·See something wrong? Report a correction →